Part of a series of designs created in the mid-1920s to meet Indian railway requirements. This narrow-gauge Prairie used the same boiler and driver set as the 0-6-2 YF, but added a leading truck. It also put more weight on the drivers.
[] notes that these had "...a wider firebox and other improvements to handle low-grade coal."
Dr. Jonathan Smith of Iowa State ([] ) for data on this design.
Part of a series of designs created in the mid-1920s to meet Indian railway requirements. Smaller than the YF Prairie, this class operated on an even narrow gauge.
[] notes that these had "...a wider firebox and other improvements to handle low-grade coal."
Dr. Jonathan Smith of Iowa State ([] ) for data on this design.
[] -- the website of India's National Rail Museum and edited by S. Shankar -- shows the RD, which looks very much as if it could be related to this design. It has low drivers, but is described as "non-standard". (The RD meant Raipur-Dhamtari, the stretch of the Bengal Nagpur Railway on which it ran.)
Part of a series of designs created in the mid-1920s to meet Indian railway requirements.This little Prairie tank had some useful power for its narrow gauge.
See [] -- the website for India's National Rail Museum -- where it comments: "Derived from an earlier very popular KC class, the ZFs were compact and powerful engines, used extensively on the hill lines of the Kalka-Simla line and Kangra Valley (Pathankot-Jogindernagar). The formidable looking machines were utilized primarily for passenger operations, and some of them survived well into the late 1980s. One unusual feature of these engines is the absence of the familiar driver's lookout when the boiler was leading. This was largely because of the large size of the side tanks, and heightened coal bunkers.Nonetheless, despite this, several drivers preferred to drive the engines boiler forward due to easier accessibility to the controls. The ZFs were fitted with Caprotti valve gear. However, later variants of this class were fitted with Walschaert's valve gear, and several of them were classed ZF/1."
[] notes that these had "...a wider firebox and other improvements to handle low-grade coal."
Dr. Jonathan Smith of Iowa State ([] ) for data on this design.
Principal Dimensions by Steve Llanso of Middle Run Media | |||
---|---|---|---|
Class | IRS/YF | IRS/ZB | IRS/ZF |
Locobase ID | 4270 | 4271 | 4272 |
Railroad | Indian Railways | Indian Railways | Indian Railways |
Country | India | India | India |
Whyte | 2-6-2 | 2-6-2 | 2-6-2T |
Number in Class | |||
Road Numbers | |||
Gauge | Metre | 2'6" | 2'6" |
Number Built | |||
Builder | several | several | several |
Year | 1925 | 1925 | 1925 |
Valve Gear | Caprotti | ||
Locomotive Length and Weight | |||
Driver Wheelbase (ft / m) | |||
Engine Wheelbase (ft / m) | |||
Ratio of driving wheelbase to overall engine wheelbase | |||
Overall Wheelbase (engine & tender) (ft / m) | |||
Axle Loading (Maximum Weight per Axle) (lbs / kg) | |||
Weight on Drivers (lbs / kg) | 56,000 / 25,401 | 40,320 / 18,289 | 64,960 / 29,465 |
Engine Weight (lbs / kg) | 80,640 / 36,578 | 64,960 / 29,465 | 94,080 / 42,674 |
Tender Loaded Weight (lbs / kg) | |||
Total Engine and Tender Weight (lbs / kg) | 94,080 / 42,674 | ||
Tender Water Capacity (gals / ML) | |||
Tender Fuel Capacity (oil/coal) (gals/tons / Liters/MT) | |||
Minimum weight of rail (calculated) (lb/yd / kg/m) | 31 / 15.50 | 22 / 11 | 36 / 18 |
Geometry Relating to Tractive Effort | |||
Driver Diameter (in / mm) | 43 / 1092 | 34 / 864 | 30 / 762 |
Boiler Pressure (psi / kPa) | 160 / 1100 | 160 / 1100 | 160 / 1100 |
High Pressure Cylinders (dia x stroke) (in / mm) | 14" x 22" / 356x559 | 12" x 18" / 305x457 | 14" x 16" / 356x406 |
Tractive Effort (lbs / kg) | 13,638 / 6186.10 | 10,368 / 4702.85 | 14,217 / 6448.73 |
Factor of Adhesion (Weight on Drivers/Tractive Effort) | 4.11 | 3.89 | 4.57 |
Heating Ability | |||
Tubes (number - dia) (in / mm) | |||
Flues (number - dia) (in / mm) | |||
Flue/Tube length (ft / m) | |||
Firebox Area (sq ft / m2) | |||
Grate Area (sq ft / m2) | 18 / 1.67 | 14 / 1.30 | 16 / 1.49 |
Evaporative Heating Surface (sq ft / m2) | 641 / 59.57 | 587 / 54.55 | |
Superheating Surface (sq ft / m2) | 136 / 12.64 | 125 / 11.62 | |
Combined Heating Surface (sq ft / m2) | 777 / 72.21 | 712 / 66.17 | |
Evaporative Heating Surface/Cylinder Volume | 163.53 | 249.13 | |
Computations Relating to Power Output (More Information) | |||
Robert LeMassena's Power Computation | 2880 | 2240 | 2560 |
Same as above plus superheater percentage | 3398 | 2643 | 2560 |
Same as above but substitute firebox area for grate area | |||
Power L1 | |||
Power MT |